Welcome back, all!
English does something rather mischievous in this examination.
It asks you to use your own words—and then gives you no credit if those words say something slightly different than what the examiner wanted.
If this seems silly and even slightly neurotic to you, don’t worry. You’re not alone. A lot of students face this problem, and they proceed to complain.
After all, why should it be that if you copy down exactly what was written in a question, those words are not your own? You wrote them down, didn’t you? Why is it that if you write whatever you want, the examiners can just fail to credit you? Isn’t your opinion equally valid? How can they judge you like this?
Anyway, cast aside the deep philosophical questions for a minute and consider:
This is how a perfectly sensible sentence enters the thesaurus and emerges wearing a top hat, three adjectives and somebody else’s meaning.
“Could” becomes “will”.
“Several” becomes “everyone”.
“Considered leaving” becomes “left”.
The vocabulary has changed.
Unfortunately, so has the truth.
What happened was that, in writing the alternatives that seemed plausible, you ended up changing the meaning of what was written. What you were supposed to do was preserve the meaning.
Using your own words is not principally a vocabulary test. It is a test of whether you can identify the meaning underneath a sentence and rebuild it accurately.
The object is not to make the sentence look different at any cost. The object is to show that you understand it well enough to reconstruct it.
Or, more simply:
Change the language. Keep the truth.
Syllabus note: The question references in this article follow the Cambridge IGCSE First Language English 0500 syllabus and specimen papers for examinations from 2027.
Where do “own words” appear in the 0500 examination?
The instruction appears in several forms across both papers.
| Part of the examination | What “use your own words” requires |
|---|---|
| Paper 1 Question 1(b) | Explain the complete contextual meaning of a phrase |
| Paper 1 Question 1(e)(ii) | Convey the relevant ideas predominantly in independent language, according to the mark scheme |
| Paper 1 Question 2(a) | Select and summarise ideas using your own words as far as possible |
| Paper 1 Question 3(b) | Explain the contextual meaning of individual words |
| Paper 1 Question 3(c) | Select exact evidence but explain its meaning and effect independently |
| Paper 1 Question 4 | Transform source material into a convincing new response and voice |
| Paper 2 Question 1(a) | Evaluate an attitude in your own words while supporting the judgement with textual details |
| Paper 2 Question 1(b) | Synthesize ideas from both texts into a new argument, form and voice |
The operation is not identical in every question.
Sometimes you are translating a short phrase. Sometimes you are compressing several ideas into a summary. Sometimes you are explaining a writer’s imagery. Sometimes you are transforming the material into an article, letter, interview or speech.
That leads us to an important distinction:
Evidence may need to remain in the writer’s words. The explanation must be in yours.
If a question asks you to identify a word or phrase from the text, copy the relevant wording accurately. Do not paraphrase the evidence and then wonder why the examiner cannot find it.
Own words are not required everywhere. Read the precise instruction.
Own words do not mean different words
This is the misconception we need to remove first.
Paraphrasing is not:
- Find every important word.
- Replace it with a synonym.
- Hope for the best.
Consider this sentence:
Although Naila had considered cancelling the market, she agreed to a smaller event because traders depended on the income.
A word-by-word approach might produce:
Despite Naila wanting to terminate the market, she organised a brief sale to assist impoverished shopkeepers.
It certainly looks different. It is also inaccurate.
- Considered has become the stronger wanted.
- Smaller has become brief, changing size into duration.
- Agreed to has become organised, changing Naila’s role.
- Depended on the income has become impoverished, adding information that was never stated.
- Traders have become shopkeepers, although those are not necessarily the same thing.
A sound version would be:
Despite thinking about calling it off, Naila approved a reduced market because the vendors relied on the money they earned there.
The sentence has changed, but its essential meaning has survived.
Here is how you deal with “use your own words” in the IGCSE 0500 exam. Ready? Let’s go!
If you haven’t signed up yet, make sure to Join Now!
Final thoughts
“Use your own words” sounds like an instruction about vocabulary.
In reality, it is an instruction about understanding.
A student with a vast vocabulary can still produce an inaccurate paraphrase. A student using simple, precise language can produce an excellent one.
Do not begin by hunting for replacements.
Find the meaning. Reduce it to its skeleton. Rebuild it naturally. Then check that the truth has survived.
Premium members can practise this process using the model response and question resources available through EnglishFirstLanguage.net membership. You can also use the IGCSE Essay Marker to examine whether your summary, directed-writing or extended-response language remains precise and properly grounded in the source.
Better own-word writing does not begin with a larger thesaurus.
It begins with more exact reading.
Change the language. Keep the truth.
V.