0500

You Are Who You Choose to Spend Time With: On environment, language, and the conscious reshaping of our intellectual lives

Victor Tan
 

“You are the average of the five people you spend time with.”


I spent some time this morning reflecting on this familiar adage, turning it over in my mind alongside thoughts about my friendships and the trajectory of my life.

The more I considered it, the more profound it became. There’s no question that the people we spend time with shape our norms, expectations, and capabilities in ways both subtle and substantial.


The Environmental Architecture of Language

If decades of academic research into human language acquisition have taught us anything, it is this: we are deeply shaped by our environment.

The language parents speak to their children from birth forms the very first linguistic memories a child absorbs and later replicates through imitation.

Those of us who did not grow up with English as our first language understand this viscerally.

A child in rural China or India has no incentive to speak English daily—the environment provides none. Instead, they navigate the world through Mandarin, Tamil, or any of the myriad languages that form the rich tapestry of human communication.

The language spoken at home becomes the linguistic lens through which they view the world, shaping not only vocabulary but values, moral frameworks, and even which dictionary—English or Malay—they might one day reach for.

The Limits of Environmental Determinism

Of course, human beings are not merely products of their environments. Individual agency matters profoundly.

From Mandarin-speaking environments have emerged scholars of English literature. Jiang Zemin, former General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, rose from destitution to master multiple languages and lead a nation. The mathematical prodigy Srinivasa Ramanujan, working in isolation from formal training, revolutionized mathematics through sheer intellectual force.

Critics of environmental determinism might invoke Noam Chomsky’s concept of the “poverty of the stimulus”—the observation that the linguistic input children receive from parents and caregivers cannot possibly account for the full complexity and creativity of their eventual language use. There must be something more, something internal, that drives our development.

This is true. And yet, it would be unwise to discount the profound role environment plays.

Explicit Rules and Tacit Knowledge

Traditional education tends to emphasize explicit rules: grammatical structures, punctuation conventions, the mechanics of avoiding comma splices. These are lessons that can be taught systematically, absorbed from textbooks, and applied with conscious effort.

But ask someone truly proficient in English—someone whose prose flows with natural eloquence—to explain why a particular turn of phrase works, and they often struggle to articulate it. I’ve observed this phenomenon countless times when questioning students who write exceptionally well. They cannot always explain their choices. They simply know.

This is tacit knowledge—the accumulated wisdom of countless interactions, texts read, patterns absorbed, habits compounded over time. It reshapes how we process, understand, and ultimately articulate language in ways that resist codification. It operates beneath conscious awareness, yet powerfully determines our linguistic capability.

Probability Is Not Destiny

Yes, someone living in an environment devoid of English speakers will very probably never speak English. The probability is higher. Much higher.
But probability is not destiny.

As human beings, we possess a remarkable capacity: we can reshape our environments. We can change whom we interact with, whom we spend time with. Those five friends—whether from family, school, workplace, or public life—can be consciously varied.

Are we not free to choose? Must we accept environments that limit us? Should we settle for spending time with those who refuse to grow, who remain content with mediocrity? Or can we seek out people who share our goals, motivations, and aspirations for excellence?

That conscious choice shapes our trajectory. And it is a choice we must recognize we possess.

Beyond People: Reshaping Your Linguistic Landscape

But environments consist of more than just people. We can also reshape the content we consume, the words we encounter daily.

It is not destined that we spend our days doom-scrolling through social media captions and Instagram reels. We have the option to read substantive blog posts, to engage with the great books that have shaped human thought across centuries – to expose ourselves to good writing and to speech and things that more represent what we want to be as we move from where we are towards a better life.

This is the harder choice, of course. Most people don’t make it.

But precisely because it is both harder and more beneficial, it holds the key to the mastery that so many casually abandon. The path less traveled rewards those brave enough to walk it.

By reading this post today, you’ve already begun to reshape your environment in small but meaningful ways.

Thank you for being part of this journey.
If you’d like to extend that commitment, I invite you to explore our vibrant member section, where you’ll find sample works, detailed resources, and a community dedicated to linguistic excellence and intellectual growth.

Whether you’re writing from Beijing or Bangalore, Cape Town or rural Kentucky, you’re welcome to join us in consciously reshaping the environment of language and thought we inhabit.

The choice, as always, is yours.


Join our Premium Member Section and shape your life today!

The PEEL Essay Structure

Victor Tan
 

If you’ve spent any time in any English class, whether it’s first language, second language, or whatever, there’s a good chance that you’ve heard of P.E.E.L.

Sorry, not a good chance.

It’s inescapable. 

Point, Evidence, Explanation Link are the words this legendary acronym is based on, the general idea is to write a good paragraph by:

1. Making your point very clear

2. Immediately giving evidence for your point

3. Explaining what the evidence means in the context of your point

4. Linking it back to either the previous paragraph or to whatever essay prompt you’re trying to respond to.

Which is why PEEL paragraphs look like this. 

EXAMPLE
Prompt:

Write a letter to your school principal arguing for or against mandatory homework.

Writer’s Intent:

To argue that students should have the freedom to choose whether to complete homework assignments.

PEEL Paragraph:

Point:

Students should be given the autonomy to decide whether homework helps their learning, rather than being forced to complete it regardless of its value.

Evidence:

A 2019 study by Stanford University found that students doing more than two hours of homework per night reported higher stress levels, physical health problems, and actually performed worse academically than peers with moderate homework loads.

Explanation:

This research shows that mandatory homework isn’t automatically beneficial—in fact, it can actively harm students when it becomes excessive or meaningless. Different students learn differently: some genuinely benefit from practice at home, while others need rest, extracurricular activities, or simply learn better through in-class work. By making homework optional, schools acknowledge that students understand their own learning needs and can make responsible choices about how to use their time productively.

Link:

Trusting students with this decision would not only improve their wellbeing but also teach them valuable self-management skills they’ll need in university and careers.

So that’s what it looks like. 

But is it the only way of writing an essay? 

No, not at all. 

Let’s deviate away to see that that’s true – here are a few other schemata that could also work for the same paragraph, available for our Premium Members!

To view this content, please sign up for a membership!

If you haven’t signed up yet, make sure to Join Now!
Already a member? Log in here

With all that said, why do teachers keep on teaching P.E.E.L like dogma, repeating it in class after class when there are so many possible and alternate constructions? 

Part of the answer is convenience. 

If you pay attention you will notice that PEEL is not only thought but also rewarded because it’s very easy to look at every paragraph and then check student paragraphs to see if they have the points, the evidence, the explanations, and the links straight away.

Also, it’s easier to keep your students from becoming confused and make sure that they follow a specific way of doing things rather than just opening up their minds to different possibilities or to ask them to reach for something that they otherwise don’t have experience with.

But it’s also true that PEEL accomplishes a very specific teaching purpose. 

It forces students to do the one thing they most resist: actually explain the connection between their evidence and their claim.

Evidence doesn’t speaks for itself – you need to contextualize it. 

What’s missing is the entire cognitive act of argumentation: showing how that quote demonstrates that claim, why those specific words matter, what the quote reveals that wouldn’t be obvious without analysis.

A student who mechanically applies PEEL at least produces something with basic argumentative structure. 

A student freed from structure too early typically produces some of the following:

∙ Unsupported assertions

∙ Quote-dropping without analysis

∙ Circular reasoning

∙ Paragraphs that don’t connect to anything

…But it’s not the only way to write. 

What did you think? Let me know your thoughts in the comments! 

Best of luck for Paper 1 tomorrow!

Victor Tan
 

Good luck to all of you out there who are taking your 0500 paper 1 tomorrow!

I trust it’s going to be an interesting experience, and as you go into the exam, go in the knowledge that you have already prepared your very best, but do remember some of the following small things.

Remember to read your questions.

When you are navigating, you need an address. If you don’t have the address, it doesn’t matter where you go, what you do, at the end of the day, you still won’t get to where it is that you want to go.

So, learn what you’re supposed to do, read the questions carefully, and then go in that direction.

Don’t just throw yourself along a path while hoping that you’ll get somewhere, because you definitely won’t.

Next tip, make sure to plan out your answers.

I know it’s very easy to just think that you should go in guns blazing, writing as fast as you possibly can, but really, planning out something can be helpful in a whole bunch of different ways.

I can’t remember who it was, but someone, perhaps it was Lincoln, said that if you were given 6 hours to chop down a tree, he would spend the first 4 sharpening the axe.

Obviously, you don’t have 4 hours during the course of your IGCSE exam, and if you try that, then you’ll be off and with no grade. So please don’t follow that advice literally; on the metaphorical front, do take some time to think about what you’re going to say, because that is going to pay dividends down the line when you structure, have a clear idea, and then finish in time.

Next tip, make sure to think about time.

Generally, each of the sections that you complete can be thought of as a 40-minute section, a 40-minute section, and a 40-minute section, respectively for your reading comprehension and then summary, then your reading comprehension, and then explanation and writer’s effect, and then finally, the extended response to reading.

Budget your time well, and make sure that you are going ahead and just ensuring that you have ample time to respond.

Next tip, when you are reading, make sure not to deceive yourself.

Remember that you are reading a text. This is not a time for you to impose your own opinions.

It is a time for you to understand, to retrieve, and from there to synthesize. It’s not time to start campaigning.

None of you are going to become Greta Thunbergs and simultaneously obtain an A-star if the cause that you are going for is environmental science when in fact the paper was actually about running a marathon. It doesn’t work that way.

My last tip, just go in with a sense that you are going to learn something along the way and that you’ve already done your best.

So treat it as a good time to go in, enjoy some interesting text, write a response, and know that you’ve already done your best by that point because it is going to be the best that you’ve done by that point.

You can’t really change anything.

I have no idea if any of you are going to retake things but that’s a separate question. Go in with a feeling that this exam will not determine your life because certainly it won’t. It may decide the kind of grade that you eventually get but that at the end of the day isn’t really going to be consequential relative to the other things that could ostensibly affect your life.

So just go in with the knowledge that it’s going to be an interesting time and that there is going to be something cool to gain right here and enjoy yourself.

That’s all there is.

Alright, good luck everyone, have a great time and I look forward to seeing you on the other side!